Unknown or unmanaged AI use
AI tools can enter the organisation through individual users, SaaS products and supplier platforms, creating blind spots before governance teams are involved.
Turn AI adoption into a controlled business capability. 2-sec helps you establish clear accountability, practical policies, proportionate controls and ongoing assurance so your organisation can use AI with greater confidence.
Teams are adopting copilots, generative AI, embedded AI features and third-party AI services faster than traditional security and governance processes were designed to handle. The challenge is not simply whether AI is allowed. It is knowing what is being used, what data is involved, who owns the risk, and what evidence demonstrates appropriate oversight.
AI tools can enter the organisation through individual users, SaaS products and supplier platforms, creating blind spots before governance teams are involved.
Security, privacy, legal, compliance, procurement and business teams may all own part of the risk without a clear decision model connecting them.
A policy alone does not govern AI. Effective governance connects rules to intake, risk assessment, technical controls, approvals, monitoring and evidence.
Prompts, uploads, model outputs and integrations can introduce confidentiality, privacy, intellectual property and data-handling concerns.
Organisations need a repeatable way to evaluate AI-enabled vendors, platform changes, data terms, security posture and dependency risk.
Customers, leadership and assurance stakeholders increasingly want evidence that AI risks are being identified, evaluated and managed consistently.
AI governance is the system an organisation uses to direct, control and oversee how AI is selected, developed, procured, deployed and used. It connects policies, decision rights, risk assessment, technical and procedural controls, monitoring and evidence so people can make consistent decisions throughout the AI lifecycle.
Defines who owns AI decisions, who approves higher-risk uses and who is responsible when controls, performance or outcomes need to be challenged or escalated.
Identifies material AI risks and applies proportionate safeguards around data use, model behaviour, human oversight, security, suppliers and operational impact.
Connects AI use with applicable law, regulation, contractual obligations, internal policies and organisational principles so governance decisions are consistent and defensible.
Maintains the records, rationale, provenance and review evidence needed to explain how AI is used, how decisions are governed and whether controls are working.
2-sec helps you establish or strengthen the governance layer around AI adoption, connecting the decisions people make with the policies, ownership, risk controls and evidence needed to support them.
Agree the outputs at the start of the engagement. The exact package reflects your AI footprint, existing controls and priorities, but the aim is the same: turn governance principles into practical mechanisms people can use.
A practical structure defining how AI decisions are made, governed, reviewed and escalated across the organisation.
Clear ownership for approvals, risk acceptance, policy, technical assurance, supplier review and ongoing oversight.
Governance requirements translated into usable rules for approved AI use, information handling, human review and exceptions.
A repeatable way to determine which AI uses need deeper review, stronger controls or leadership attention.
A clear view of gaps, dependencies and next steps so governance can mature without trying to solve everything at once.
Effective AI governance is a repeatable decision system. We structure the work around five connected stages so governance remains useful as new tools and use cases appear.
Identify AI tools, use cases, data flows, suppliers, owners and business dependencies.
Set governance principles, roles, policies, risk criteria, approval thresholds and evidence requirements.
Translate policy into practical technical, procedural, contractual and people controls.
Review higher-risk use cases, suppliers and controls, then capture defensible evidence of oversight.
Monitor changes, exceptions, incidents and new use cases so governance evolves with adoption.
AI governance works best when it strengthens existing security, privacy, procurement, assurance and operational processes rather than creating a separate bureaucracy beside them.
Connect AI approvals with identity, permissions, integrations, data access, misuse scenarios and resilience controls.
Align AI use with privacy, confidentiality, data classification and information-handling requirements.
Build AI-specific questions into procurement, due diligence, contract review and ongoing supplier assurance.
Use risk assessment and technical testing when governance decisions depend on evidence about actual AI behaviour or control effectiveness.
Track new use cases, exceptions, incidents, supplier changes and control performance so governance stays relevant as AI adoption evolves.
AI Governance is the organising layer of 2-sec’s AI practice. It gives your organisation the responsibilities, decision routes and oversight needed to act on risk findings, turn policy into working rules and decide where stronger evidence or a formal management system is needed.
Identify where AI introduces material risk to systems, data and business activity, then prioritise what needs attention.
Translate governance decisions into clear guidance around approved tools, data handling, human review and responsibilities.
Build and evidence an AI management system that can support independent ISO 42001 certification within an agreed scope.
Challenge AI applications with realistic manipulation attempts and bring observed technical evidence back into governance decisions.
AI governance is the system of policies, roles, decision rules, risk assessments, controls and assurance activities used to guide how an organisation selects, develops, buys, deploys and uses AI.
Yes. Even when you are not building your own models, AI use can affect confidential information, personal data, intellectual property, supplier risk, decision quality and customer expectations. Governance should be proportionate to how the tools are used.
It should. A practical approach reuses existing security, privacy, procurement, risk and assurance processes wherever possible, then adds AI-specific decision points where the existing controls are not sufficient.
The right reference points depend on your organisation, markets and objectives. Work can be aligned to recognised AI governance and risk-management approaches, as well as your existing security, privacy and compliance framework obligations.
Start with visibility. Establish what AI is already being used, which business processes and data are involved, and where current policies or controls do not match actual behaviour. From there, governance can be prioritised around the highest-value and highest-risk gaps.
Speak with 2-sec about your current AI use, governance maturity and risk priorities. We’ll help you identify where practical controls can create the greatest confidence without adding unnecessary friction.