Payment-Page Architecture Review
Map redirects, iframes, JavaScript, hosted payment forms and any merchant-controlled elements that can influence the payment transaction.
Even when a payment processor handles the card data, your ecommerce website can still affect payment security. PCI DSS v4.x places specific responsibilities on merchants around website security, SAQ eligibility, scanning and the scripts that can influence the payment page.
2-sec helps ecommerce businesses work out which PCI validation route actually fits their payment implementation, what remains in scope, and what must be secured or evidenced before submission.
For ecommerce merchants, PCI DSS scope and SAQ eligibility depend heavily on how the website interacts with the payment page: full redirection, an embedded provider form, merchant-originated payment-page elements or other browser-side scripts can lead to different validation requirements.
PCI SSC's current guidance distinguishes redirect and embedded-payment implementations and adds specific v4.x obligations around merchant ecommerce webpages. SAQ A merchants, including those that redirect to a third party, can still have ASV scanning responsibilities for the merchant website.
The goal is to match the real browser and payment architecture to the correct validation route rather than selecting an SAQ by assumption.
Map redirects, iframes, JavaScript, hosted payment forms and any merchant-controlled elements that can influence the payment transaction.
Assess likely eligibility for SAQ A, SAQ A-EP or another route and identify where the current implementation does not meet the criteria.
Review the controls protecting merchant ecommerce pages from script-based attacks that could affect payment security.
Identify ecommerce webpages that require external vulnerability scanning and prepare them for Approved Scanning Vendor activity.
Clarify what the payment processor or other TPSPs cover and what responsibilities remain with the merchant.
Close website, configuration, process and evidence gaps before the SAQ or other validation is completed.
These are decision patterns, not automatic SAQ assignments. All eligibility criteria and reporting expectations still need to be confirmed.
Document exactly what the browser loads, where payment data goes and which party controls each element.
Compare the implementation with current PCI SSC eligibility criteria and confirm the reporting expectation.
Separate provider-covered controls from the requirements that remain with the merchant.
Review scanning, script protection, patching, authentication and other applicable website controls.
Fix gaps and collect the evidence behind the final PCI responses.
Prepare the relevant SAQ, attestation or wider assessment route.
Yes. PCI SSC confirms that outsourcing payment processing does not remove a merchant's PCI DSS responsibilities. Eligible SAQ A ecommerce merchants also have requirements that apply to their own webpages.
Yes. PCI SSC states that SAQ A for PCI DSS v4.x includes external vulnerability scanning by an Approved Scanning Vendor for merchant ecommerce webpages, including redirect and embedded-iframe implementations.
For ecommerce merchants using an embedded TPSP payment page or form, current SAQ A eligibility includes confirming that the merchant webpage is not susceptible to attacks from scripts that could affect the ecommerce system.
Broadly, SAQ A requires all payment-page elements to originate only from compliant service providers, while SAQ A-EP can apply where payment-page elements originate from the merchant website or compliant service providers, provided all other eligibility criteria are met.
Yes. 2-sec can review the current payment architecture and advise on defensible scope-reduction options, including outsourcing and segmentation where appropriate.